top of page

Articles in international journals

45. Baiano, C., Job, X., Kirsch, L., & Auvray, M (2023). Interoceptive abilities facilitate taking another’s spatial  perspective. Scientific Reports, 13, 10064. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36173-6 [IF: 4.6]. (link) (pdf)


44. Poivet, R., Lopez, M., Pelachaud, C., & Auvray, M. (2023). The influence of conversational agents' role and communication style on user experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1266186 [IF: 4.2]. (link) (pdf)


43. Job, X., Kirsch, L., & Auvray, M. (2022). Spatial perspective-taking: Insights from sensory impairments. Experimental Brain Research, 240, 27-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06221-6 [IF: 1.59]. (link)  (pdf)

42. Baiano, C., Job, X., Auvray§, M., & Kirsch§, L. (2021). Interactions between interoception and perspective-taking: Current state of research and future directions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 130, 252-262. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.007 (§shared last authorship) [IF: 8.33]. (link) (pdf)


41. Pesnot-Lerousseau, J., Arnold, G., & Auvray, M. (2021). Training-induced plasticity enables visualizing sounds with a visual-to-auditory conversion device. Scientific Reports, 11, 14762. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94133-4. [IF: 4.0] (link) (pdf)


40. Job, X., Arnold, G., Kirsch, L., Auvray, M. (2021). Vision shapes tactile spatial perspective-taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 50, 1918-1925. doi: 10.1037/xge0000923 [IF: 3.50] (pdf)

39. Job, X., Kirsch, L., Inard, S., Arnold, G., & Auvray, M. (2021). Spatial perspective-taking is related to social intelligence and attachment style. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 109726. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109726 [IF: 2.0]. (pdf

38. Kirsch, L., Job, X., Auvray§, M., & Hayward§, V. (2020). Harnessing tactile waves to measure skin-to-skin interactions. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 1469-1477. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01492-3 (§Shared last authorship) [IF: 4.42] (pdf)

37. Kirsch, L., Job, X., & Auvray, M. (2020). Mixing up the senses: Sensory substitution is not a form of artificially induced synaesthesia. Multisensory Research, 34, 297-322. doi:10.1163/22134808-bja10010 [IF: 2.34]. (pdf)

36. Roque, J., Lafraire, J., & Auvray, M. (2020). Audiovisual crossmodal correspondence between bubbles’ size and pouring sounds’ pitch in carbonated beverages. Foods, 9, 966. doi: 10.3390/foods9080966 [IF: 4.09]. (pdf)

35. Hanneton, S., Hoellinger, T., Forma, V., Roby-Brami, A. & Auvray, M. (2020). Ears on the hand. Reaching three-dimensional targets with an audio-motor device. Multisensory Research, 4-5, 433-455. doi: 10.1163/22134808-20191436 [IF: 2.34]. (pdf)


34. Auvray, M. (2019). Multisensory and spatial processes in sensory substitution. Restaurative Neurology and Neuroscience, 37, 609-619. doi: 10.3233/RNN-190950 [IF: 1.84]. (pdf)

33. Arnold, G., Sarlegna, F., Fernandez, L., & Auvray, M. (2019). Somatosensory loss influences the adoption of self-centered versus decentered perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 419. [IF: 2.09] (pdf)


32. Roque, J., Lafraire, J., Spence, C., & Auvray, M. (2018). The influence of audiovisual stimuli cuing temperature, carbonation, and color on the categorization of freshness in beverages. Journal of Sensory Studies, 33, e12469. [IF: 1.75] (pdf)


31. Renault, A. G., Auvray, M., Parseihian, G., Miall, R. C., Cole, J., & Sarlegna, F. (2018). Does proprioception influence human spatial cognition? A study on individuals with massive deafferentation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1322. [IF: 2.09] (pdf)

30. Arnold, G., & Auvray, M. (2018). Tactile recognition of visual stimuli: Specificity versus generalization of perceptual learning. Vision Research, 152, 40-50.  [IF: 2.07] (pdf)

29. Roque, J., Auvray, M., & Lafraire, J. (2018). Investigating the cognitive mechanisms underlying freshness perception: a research review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2360. [IF: 2.09] (pdf)

28. Arnold, G., Spence, C., & Auvray, M. (2017). A unity of the self or a multiplicity of locations? How the graphesthesia task sheds light on the role of spatial perspectives in bodily self-consciousness. Consciousness & Cognition, 56, 100-114. [IF: 2.27] (pdf)

27. Arnold, G., Pesnot-Lerousseau, J. & Auvray, M. (2017). Individual differences in sensory substitution. Multisensory Research, 6, 579-600. 10.1163/22134808-00002561 [IF: 2.34] (pdf)

26. Arnold, G. & Auvray, M. (2017). The graphesthesia paradigm: drawing letters on the body to investigate the embodied nature of spatial perspective taking. I-Perception, 8, 1-5. 10.1177/2041669517690163 [IF: 0.94] (pdf)

25. Deroy, O., Fasiello, I., Hayward, V., & Auvray, M. (2016). Differentiated audio-tactile correspondences in sighted and blind individuals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1204-1214. [IF: 2.29] (pdf)

24. O’Brien, J., & Auvray, M. (2016). Cognition overrides orientation dependence in tactile viewpoint selection. Experimental Brain Research, 234, 1885-1892. 10.1007/s00221-016-4596-6 [IF: 1.81] (pdf)

23. Arnold, G., Spence, C., & Auvray, M. (2016). Taking someone else’s spatial perspective: Natural stance or effortful decentring? Cognition, 148, 27-33. [IF: 3.35] (pdf)

22. Hanneton, S., Herquel, P., & Auvray, M. (2015). Intermodal recoding of a video game: Learning to process signals for motion perception in a pure auditory environment. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 29, 1475-1483.  10.1002/acs.2549 [IF: 2.08] (pdf)


21. O’Brien, J., & Auvray, M. (2014). The process of distal attribution illuminated through studies of sensory substitution. Multisensory Research, 27, 421-441. 10.1163/22134808-00002456 [IF: 2.34] (pdf)

20. Auvray, M., & Harris, L.R. (2014). The state of the art of sensory substitution. Multisensory Research, 27, 265-269. 10.1163/22134808-00002464 [IF: 2.34] (pdf)

19. Arnold, G., & Auvray, M. (2014). Perceptual learning: Tactile letter recognition transfers across body surfaces. Multisensory Research, 27, 71-90. 10.1163/22134808-00002443 [IF: 2.34] (pdf)

18. Deroy, O., & Auvray, M. (2012). Reading the world through sensory substitution devices. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 457. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00457 [IF: 2.09] (pdf)

17. Auvray, M., & Rohde, M. (2012). Perceptual crossing: The simplest online paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 181. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00181 [IF: 2.87] (pdf)

16. Simard, J., Ammi, M., & Auvray, M. (2012). Collaborative strategies for the search of 3D targets in molecular environments. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 6, 1555-1565. 10.1155/2012/546521 [IF: 5.13] (pdf)

15. Katz, B., Kammoun, S., Parseihian, G., Gutierrez, O., Brilhault, A., Auvray, M., Truillet, P., Denis, M., Thorpe, S., & Jouffrais, C. (2012). NAVIG: Augmented reality guidance system for the visually impaired. Virtual Reality Journal, 16, 253-269. 10.1007/s10055-012-0213-6 (pdf)

14. Auvray, M., Hoellinger, T., Hanneton, S., & Roby-Brami, A. (2011). Perceptual weight judgments when viewing one’s own and other’s movements under minimalist conditions of visual presentation. Perception, 40, 1081-1103. [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

13. Auvray, M., Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2011). Tactile short term memory for stimuli presented on the fingertips and across the rest of the body surface. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1227-1241. 10.3758/s13414-011-0098-6 [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

12. Hanneton, S., Auvray, M., & Durette, B. (2010). The Vibe: A versatile vision-to-audition sensory substitution device. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 7, 269-276. 10.1080/11762322.2010.512734 [IF: 1.77] (pdf)


11. Auvray, M., Myin, E., & Spence, C. (2010). The sensory-discriminative and affective-motivational aspects of pain. In F. McGlone (Ed.) Touch, Temperature, Pleasure, and Pain, special issue of Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 214-223. [IF: 8.04] (pdf)

10. Auvray, M., & Myin, E. (2009). Perception with compensatory devices. From sensory substitution to sensorimotor extension. Cognitive Science, 33, 1036-1058. 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01040.x [IF: 2.62] (pdf)

9. Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist environment. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 79-97. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.12.002 [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

8. Auvray, M., Gallace, A., Hartcher-O’Brien, J., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2008). Tactile and visual distractors induce change blindness for tactile stimuli presented on the fingertips. Brain Research, 1213, 111-119. [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

7. Auvray, M., & Spence, C. (2008). The multisensory perception of flavour. Consciousness & Cognition, 17, 1016-1031. [IF: 2.27] (pdf)

6. Auvray, M., Gallace, A., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2007). Crossmodal change blindness between vision and touch. Acta Psychologica, 126, 79-97. [IF: 1.86] (pdf)

5. Auvray, M., Philipona, D., O’Regan, J. K., & Spence, C. (2007). The perception of space and form recognition in a simulated environment: The case of minimalist sensory-substitution devices. Perception, 36, 1736-1751. [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

4. Auvray, M., Hanneton, S., & O’Regan, J. K. (2007). Learning to perceive with a visuo-auditory substitution system: Localization and object recognition with The Voice. Perception, 36, 416-430.  [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

3. Gallace, A., Auvray, M., & Spence, C. (2007). The modulation of haptic line bisection using a visual illusion and optokinetic stimulation. Perception, 36, 1003-1018.​ [IF: 1.37] (pdf)


2. Gallace, A., Auvray, M., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2006). When visual transients impair tactile change detection: A novel case of crossmodal change blindness? Neuroscience Letters, 398, 280-285. [IF: 2.16] (pdf)


1. Auvray, M., Hanneton, S., Lenay, C., & O’Regan, J. K. (2005). There is something out there: Distal attribution in sensory substitution, twenty years later. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 4, 505-521. 10.1142/S0219635205001002 [IF: 0.66] (pdf)


Articles in national peer-reviewed journals 

4. Brunet, L. Darses, F., & Auvray, M. (2018). Strategies and needs of blind pedestrians during urban navigation. Le Travail Humain, 81, 141-171. [IF: 0.88] (pdf)

3. Auvray, M., & Fuchs, P. (2007). Perception, immersion et interactions sensorimotrices en environnement virtuel. In A. Grumbach & E. Klinger (Eds.), Réalité Virtuelle et Cognition (pp. 23-36), numéro spécial de Intellectica.

2. Auvray, M., & O’Regan, J. K. (2003). L’influence des facteurs sémantiques sur la cécité aux changements progressifs dans les scènes visuelles. L’Année Psychologique, 103, 9-32. 10.3406/psy.2003.29621 [IF: 0.21] (pdf)

1. Auvray, M. (2003). Bergson, une théorie sensorimotrice de la perception. Psychologie et Histoire, 4, 61-100. (pdf)

Book chapters

9. Ptito, M., Iversen, K., Auvray, M., Deroy, O., Kupers, R. (2018). Limits of the classical functionalist perspective on sensory substitution. In F. Macpherson (Ed.). Sensory Substitution and Augmentation, London: Proceedings of the British Academy. 


8. Auvray, M., & Farina, M. (2017). Patrolling the boundaries of synaethesia: A critical appraisal of transient and artificially-acquired forms of synaesthetic experiences. In O. Deroy (Ed.). Synaesthesia: Philosophical & Psychological Challenges (pp. 248-274), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199688289.003.0013 (pdf)


7. Auvray, M., & Deroy, O. (2015). How do synesthetes experience the world? In M. Matthen (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception (pp. 640-658), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.013.027 (pdf)

6. Deroy, O., & Auvray, M. (2014). A crossmodal perspective on sensory substitution. In S. Biggs, M. Matthen, & D. Stokes (Eds.), Perception and Its Modalities (pp. 327-349), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199832798.003.0014 (pdf)


5. Spence, C., Auvray, M., & Smith, B. (2014). Confusing tastes with flavours. In S. Biggs, M. Matthen, & D. Stokes (Eds.), Perception and Its Modalities (pp. 247-276), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199832798.003.0011 (pdf)


4. Gallay, M., Denis, M., & Auvray, M. (2013). Navigation assistance for blind pedestrians: Guidelines for the design of devices and implications for spatial cognition. In T. Tenbrink, J. Wiener, & C. Claramunt (Eds.), Representing space in cognition: Interrelations of behaviour, language, and formal models, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679911.003.0011 (pdf)

3. Tarroux, P., & Auvray, M. (2012). La perception visuelle. In M. Denis (Ed.), La Psychologie Cognitive (pp. 39-69), Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme. (pdf)

2. Auvray, M. (2006). Remplacer un sens par un autre: La suppléance perceptive. In P. Fuchs (Ed.), Le Traité de la Réalité Virtuelle III, Vol.1, L’Homme et l’Environnement Virtuel (pp. 173-188). Paris: Les Presses de l’Ecole des Mines. (pdf)

1. Auvray, M. (2006). Théories de la perception: Le monde comme mémoire externe. In P. Fuchs (Ed.), Le Traité de la Réalité Virtuelle III, Vol.1, L’Homme et l’Environnement Virtuel (pp. 209-228). Paris: Les Presses de l’Ecole des Mines. (pdf)


Other publications

6. Katz, B., Dramas, F., Parseihian, G., Gutierrez, O., Kammoun, S., Brilhault, A., Brunet, L., Gallay, M., Oriola, B., Auvray, M., Truillet, P., Denis, M., Thorpe, S., & Jouffrais, C. (2012). NAVIG guidance system for the visually impaired using virtual augmented reality. Technology and Disability, 24, 163-178. 10.3233/TAD-2012-0344 (pdf)

5. Kammoun, S., Parseihian, G., Gutierrez, O., Brilhault, A., Serpa, A., Raynal, M., Oriola, B., Macé, M., Auvray, M., Denis, M., Thorpe, S., Truillet, P., Katz B., Jouffrais, C., (2012). Navigation and space perception assistance for the visually impaired: The NAVIG project. IRBM, Ingénierie et Recherche Biomédicale, 33, 182-189. 10.1016/j.irbm.2012.01.009 (pdf)

4. Gauchou, H., & Auvray, M. (2007). L’inhibition comme absence de représentation: L’exemple de la cécité aux changements. Le Journal des Psychologues, 244, 29-34. 10.3917/jdp.244.0029

3. Auvray, M., Lenay, C., O’Regan, J. K., & Lefèvre, J. (2005). Suppléance perceptive, immersion et informations proprioceptives. Arobase, 1, 94-114.

2. Khatchatourov, A., & Auvray, M. (2005). L’outil modifie-t’il la perception ou la rend-il possible ? Arobase, 1, 65-70.


1. Auvray, M. (2005). La suppléance perceptive: Implications sur les théories de la perception. VOIR, n° 30-31. Les aspects culturels de la vision et les autres modalités perceptives III. L’ouïe, 2-13.

bottom of page