Articles in international journals

​

45. Baiano, C., Job, X., Kirsch, L., & Auvray, M (2023). Interoceptive abilities facilitate taking another’s spatial  perspective. Scientific Reports, 13, 10064. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36173-6 [IF: 4.6]. (link) (pdf)

 

44. Poivet, R., Lopez, M., Pelachaud, C., & Auvray, M. (2023). The influence of conversational agents' role and communication style on user experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1266186 [IF: 4.2]. (link) (pdf)

 

43. Job, X., Kirsch, L., & Auvray, M. (2022). Spatial perspective-taking: Insights from sensory impairments. Experimental Brain Research, 240, 27-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06221-6 [IF: 1.59]. (link)  (pdf)

​

42. Baiano, C., Job, X., Auvray§, M., & Kirsch§, L. (2021). Interactions between interoception and perspective-taking: Current state of research and future directions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 130, 252-262. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.007 (§shared last authorship) [IF: 8.33]. (link) (pdf)

 

41. Pesnot-Lerousseau, J., Arnold, G., & Auvray, M. (2021). Training-induced plasticity enables visualizing sounds with a visual-to-auditory conversion device. Scientific Reports, 11, 14762. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94133-4. [IF: 4.0] (link) (pdf)

 

40. Job, X., Arnold, G., Kirsch, L., Auvray, M. (2021). Vision shapes tactile spatial perspective-taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 50, 1918-1925. doi: 10.1037/xge0000923 [IF: 3.50] (pdf)

​

39. Job, X., Kirsch, L., Inard, S., Arnold, G., & Auvray, M. (2021). Spatial perspective-taking is related to social intelligence and attachment style. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 109726. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109726 [IF: 2.0]. (pdf) 

​

38. Kirsch, L., Job, X., Auvray§, M., & Hayward§, V. (2020). Harnessing tactile waves to measure skin-to-skin interactions. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 1469-1477. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01492-3 (§Shared last authorship) [IF: 4.42] (pdf)

​

37. Kirsch, L., Job, X., & Auvray, M. (2020). Mixing up the senses: Sensory substitution is not a form of artificially induced synaesthesia. Multisensory Research, 34, 297-322. doi:10.1163/22134808-bja10010 [IF: 2.34]. (pdf)

​

36. Roque, J., Lafraire, J., & Auvray, M. (2020). Audiovisual crossmodal correspondence between bubbles’ size and pouring sounds’ pitch in carbonated beverages. Foods, 9, 966. doi: 10.3390/foods9080966 [IF: 4.09]. (pdf)

​

35. Hanneton, S., Hoellinger, T., Forma, V., Roby-Brami, A. & Auvray, M. (2020). Ears on the hand. Reaching three-dimensional targets with an audio-motor device. Multisensory Research, 4-5, 433-455. doi: 10.1163/22134808-20191436 [IF: 2.34]. (pdf)

 

34. Auvray, M. (2019). Multisensory and spatial processes in sensory substitution. Restaurative Neurology and Neuroscience, 37, 609-619. doi: 10.3233/RNN-190950 [IF: 1.84]. (pdf)

​

33. Arnold, G., Sarlegna, F., Fernandez, L., & Auvray, M. (2019). Somatosensory loss influences the adoption of self-centered versus decentered perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 419. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00419 [IF: 2.09] (pdf)

 

32. Roque, J., Lafraire, J., Spence, C., & Auvray, M. (2018). The influence of audiovisual stimuli cuing temperature, carbonation, and color on the categorization of freshness in beverages. Journal of Sensory Studies, 33, e12469. doi.org/10.1111/joss.12469 [IF: 1.75] (pdf)

 

31. Renault, A. G., Auvray, M., Parseihian, G., Miall, R. C., Cole, J., & Sarlegna, F. (2018). Does proprioception influence human spatial cognition? A study on individuals with massive deafferentation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1322. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01322 [IF: 2.09] (pdf)

​

30. Arnold, G., & Auvray, M. (2018). Tactile recognition of visual stimuli: Specificity versus generalization of perceptual learning. Vision Research, 152, 40-50. doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.11.007  [IF: 2.07] (pdf)

​

29. Roque, J., Auvray, M., & Lafraire, J. (2018). Investigating the cognitive mechanisms underlying freshness perception: a research review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2360. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02360 [IF: 2.09] (pdf)

​

28. Arnold, G., Spence, C., & Auvray, M. (2017). A unity of the self or a multiplicity of locations? How the graphesthesia task sheds light on the role of spatial perspectives in bodily self-consciousness. Consciousness & Cognition, 56, 100-114. doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.012 [IF: 2.27] (pdf)

​

27. Arnold, G., Pesnot-Lerousseau, J. & Auvray, M. (2017). Individual differences in sensory substitution. Multisensory Research, 6, 579-600. doi.org: 10.1163/22134808-00002561 [IF: 2.34] (pdf)

​

26. Arnold, G. & Auvray, M. (2017). The graphesthesia paradigm: drawing letters on the body to investigate the embodied nature of spatial perspective taking. I-Perception, 8, 1-5. doi.org: 10.1177/2041669517690163 [IF: 0.94] (pdf)

​

25. Deroy, O., Fasiello, I., Hayward, V., & Auvray, M. (2016). Differentiated audio-tactile correspondences in sighted and blind individuals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1204-1214. doi.org:10.1037/xhp000015 [IF: 2.29] (pdf)

​

24. O’Brien, J., & Auvray, M. (2016). Cognition overrides orientation dependence in tactile viewpoint selection. Experimental Brain Research, 234, 1885-1892. doi.org: 10.1007/s00221-016-4596-6 [IF: 1.81] (pdf)

​

23. Arnold, G., Spence, C., & Auvray, M. (2016). Taking someone else’s spatial perspective: Natural stance or effortful decentring? Cognition, 148, 27-33. doi.org:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.006 [IF: 3.35] (pdf)

​

22. Hanneton, S., Herquel, P., & Auvray, M. (2015). Intermodal recoding of a video game: Learning to process signals for motion perception in a pure auditory environment. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 29, 1475-1483. doi.org:  10.1002/acs.2549 [IF: 2.08] (pdf)

 

21. O’Brien, J., & Auvray, M. (2014). The process of distal attribution illuminated through studies of sensory substitution. Multisensory Research, 27, 421-441. doi.org: 10.1163/22134808-00002456 [IF: 2.34] (pdf)

​

20. Auvray, M., & Harris, L.R. (2014). The state of the art of sensory substitution. Multisensory Research, 27, 265-269. doi.org: 10.1163/22134808-00002464 [IF: 2.34] (pdf)

​

19. Arnold, G., & Auvray, M. (2014). Perceptual learning: Tactile letter recognition transfers across body surfaces. Multisensory Research, 27, 71-90. doi.org: 10.1163/22134808-00002443 [IF: 2.34] (pdf)

​

18. Deroy, O., & Auvray, M. (2012). Reading the world through sensory substitution devices. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 457. doi.org: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00457 [IF: 2.09] (pdf)

​

17. Auvray, M., & Rohde, M. (2012). Perceptual crossing: The simplest online paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 181. doi.org: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00181 [IF: 2.87] (pdf)

​

16. Simard, J., Ammi, M., & Auvray, M. (2012). Collaborative strategies for the search of 3D targets in molecular environments. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 6, 1555-1565. doi.org: 10.1155/2012/546521 [IF: 5.13] (pdf)

​

15. Katz, B., Kammoun, S., Parseihian, G., Gutierrez, O., Brilhault, A., Auvray, M., Truillet, P., Denis, M., Thorpe, S., & Jouffrais, C. (2012). NAVIG: Augmented reality guidance system for the visually impaired. Virtual Reality Journal, 16, 253-269. doi.org: 10.1007/s10055-012-0213-6 (pdf)

​

14. Auvray, M., Hoellinger, T., Hanneton, S., & Roby-Brami, A. (2011). Perceptual weight judgments when viewing one’s own and other’s movements under minimalist conditions of visual presentation. Perception, 40, 1081-1103. doi.org:10.1068/p6879 [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

​

13. Auvray, M., Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2011). Tactile short term memory for stimuli presented on the fingertips and across the rest of the body surface. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1227-1241. doi.org: 10.3758/s13414-011-0098-6 [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

​

12. Hanneton, S., Auvray, M., & Durette, B. (2010). The Vibe: A versatile vision-to-audition sensory substitution device. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 7, 269-276. doi.org: 10.1080/11762322.2010.512734 [IF: 1.77] (pdf)

 

11. Auvray, M., Myin, E., & Spence, C. (2010). The sensory-discriminative and affective-motivational aspects of pain. In F. McGlone (Ed.) Touch, Temperature, Pleasure, and Pain, special issue of Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 214-223. doi.org:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.008 [IF: 8.04] (pdf)

​

10. Auvray, M., & Myin, E. (2009). Perception with compensatory devices. From sensory substitution to sensorimotor extension. Cognitive Science, 33, 1036-1058. doi.org: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01040.x [IF: 2.62] (pdf)

​

9. Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist environment. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 79-97. doi.org: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.12.002 [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

​

8. Auvray, M., Gallace, A., Hartcher-O’Brien, J., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2008). Tactile and visual distractors induce change blindness for tactile stimuli presented on the fingertips. Brain Research, 1213, 111-119. doi.org:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.015 [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

​

7. Auvray, M., & Spence, C. (2008). The multisensory perception of flavour. Consciousness & Cognition, 17, 1016-1031. doi.org:10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.005 [IF: 2.27] (pdf)

​

6. Auvray, M., Gallace, A., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2007). Crossmodal change blindness between vision and touch. Acta Psychologica, 126, 79-97. doi.org:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.10.005 [IF: 1.86] (pdf)

​

5. Auvray, M., Philipona, D., O’Regan, J. K., & Spence, C. (2007). The perception of space and form recognition in a simulated environment: The case of minimalist sensory-substitution devices. Perception, 36, 1736-1751. doi.org:10.1068/p5800 [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

​

4. Auvray, M., Hanneton, S., & O’Regan, J. K. (2007). Learning to perceive with a visuo-auditory substitution system: Localization and object recognition with The Voice. Perception, 36, 416-430. doi.org:10.1068/p5631  [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

​

3. Gallace, A., Auvray, M., & Spence, C. (2007). The modulation of haptic line bisection using a visual illusion and optokinetic stimulation. Perception, 36, 1003-1018. doi.org:10.1068/p5457​ [IF: 1.37] (pdf)

 

2. Gallace, A., Auvray, M., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2006). When visual transients impair tactile change detection: A novel case of crossmodal change blindness? Neuroscience Letters, 398, 280-285. doi.org:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.01.009 [IF: 2.16] (pdf)

 

1. Auvray, M., Hanneton, S., Lenay, C., & O’Regan, J. K. (2005). There is something out there: Distal attribution in sensory substitution, twenty years later. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 4, 505-521. doi.org: 10.1142/S0219635205001002 [IF: 0.66] (pdf)

 

Articles in national peer-reviewed journals 

​

4. Brunet, L. Darses, F., & Auvray, M. (2018). Strategies and needs of blind pedestrians during urban navigation. Le Travail Humain, 81, 141-171. doi.org/10.3917/th.812.0141 [IF: 0.88] (pdf)

3. Auvray, M., & Fuchs, P. (2007). Perception, immersion et interactions sensorimotrices en environnement virtuel. In A. Grumbach & E. Klinger (Eds.), Réalité Virtuelle et Cognition (pp. 23-36), numéro spécial de Intellectica.

2. Auvray, M., & O’Regan, J. K. (2003). L’influence des facteurs sémantiques sur la cécité aux changements progressifs dans les scènes visuelles. L’Année Psychologique, 103, 9-32. doi.org: 10.3406/psy.2003.29621 [IF: 0.21] (pdf)

1. Auvray, M. (2003). Bergson, une théorie sensorimotrice de la perception. Psychologie et Histoire, 4, 61-100. (pdf)

​

Book chapters

​

9. Ptito, M., Iversen, K., Auvray, M., Deroy, O., Kupers, R. (2018). Limits of the classical functionalist perspective on sensory substitution. In F. Macpherson (Ed.). Sensory Substitution and Augmentation, London: Proceedings of the British Academy. 

 

8. Auvray, M., & Farina, M. (2017). Patrolling the boundaries of synaethesia: A critical appraisal of transient and artificially-acquired forms of synaesthetic experiences. In O. Deroy (Ed.). Synaesthesia: Philosophical & Psychological Challenges (pp. 248-274), Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi.org: 10.1093/oso/9780199688289.003.0013 (pdf)

 

7. Auvray, M., & Deroy, O. (2015). How do synesthetes experience the world? In M. Matthen (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception (pp. 640-658), Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi.org: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.013.027 (pdf)

​

6. Deroy, O., & Auvray, M. (2014). A crossmodal perspective on sensory substitution. In S. Biggs, M. Matthen, & D. Stokes (Eds.), Perception and Its Modalities (pp. 327-349), Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi.org: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199832798.003.0014 (pdf)

 

5. Spence, C., Auvray, M., & Smith, B. (2014). Confusing tastes with flavours. In S. Biggs, M. Matthen, & D. Stokes (Eds.), Perception and Its Modalities (pp. 247-276), Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi.org: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199832798.003.0011 (pdf)

 

4. Gallay, M., Denis, M., & Auvray, M. (2013). Navigation assistance for blind pedestrians: Guidelines for the design of devices and implications for spatial cognition. In T. Tenbrink, J. Wiener, & C. Claramunt (Eds.), Representing space in cognition: Interrelations of behaviour, language, and formal models, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi.org: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679911.003.0011 (pdf)

​

3. Tarroux, P., & Auvray, M. (2012). La perception visuelle. In M. Denis (Ed.), La Psychologie Cognitive (pp. 39-69), Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme. (pdf)

​

2. Auvray, M. (2006). Remplacer un sens par un autre: La suppléance perceptive. In P. Fuchs (Ed.), Le Traité de la Réalité Virtuelle III, Vol.1, L’Homme et l’Environnement Virtuel (pp. 173-188). Paris: Les Presses de l’Ecole des Mines. (pdf)

​

1. Auvray, M. (2006). Théories de la perception: Le monde comme mémoire externe. In P. Fuchs (Ed.), Le Traité de la Réalité Virtuelle III, Vol.1, L’Homme et l’Environnement Virtuel (pp. 209-228). Paris: Les Presses de l’Ecole des Mines. (pdf)

 

Other publications

​

6. Katz, B., Dramas, F., Parseihian, G., Gutierrez, O., Kammoun, S., Brilhault, A., Brunet, L., Gallay, M., Oriola, B., Auvray, M., Truillet, P., Denis, M., Thorpe, S., & Jouffrais, C. (2012). NAVIG guidance system for the visually impaired using virtual augmented reality. Technology and Disability, 24, 163-178. doi.org: 10.3233/TAD-2012-0344 (pdf)

​

5. Kammoun, S., Parseihian, G., Gutierrez, O., Brilhault, A., Serpa, A., Raynal, M., Oriola, B., Macé, M., Auvray, M., Denis, M., Thorpe, S., Truillet, P., Katz B., Jouffrais, C., (2012). Navigation and space perception assistance for the visually impaired: The NAVIG project. IRBM, Ingénierie et Recherche Biomédicale, 33, 182-189. doi.org: 10.1016/j.irbm.2012.01.009 (pdf)

​

4. Gauchou, H., & Auvray, M. (2007). L’inhibition comme absence de représentation: L’exemple de la cécité aux changements. Le Journal des Psychologues, 244, 29-34. doi.org: 10.3917/jdp.244.0029

​

3. Auvray, M., Lenay, C., O’Regan, J. K., & Lefèvre, J. (2005). Suppléance perceptive, immersion et informations proprioceptives. Arobase, 1, 94-114.

​

2. Khatchatourov, A., & Auvray, M. (2005). L’outil modifie-t’il la perception ou la rend-il possible ? Arobase, 1, 65-70.

 

1. Auvray, M. (2005). La suppléance perceptive: Implications sur les théories de la perception. VOIR, n° 30-31. Les aspects culturels de la vision et les autres modalités perceptives III. L’ouïe, 2-13.